Evaluation – Individuals Convicted for Sexual & Violent Offenses Who Have Personality Disorders: Treatment, Case Management, and Beyond (OT166-A)

Evaluation – Individuals Convicted for Sexual & Violent Offenses Who Have Personality Disorders: Treatment, Case Management, and Beyond (OT166-A)

Course Name: Individuals Convicted for Sexual & Violent Offenses Who Have Personality Disorders: Treatment, Case Management, and Beyond

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Explain the ways in which personality disorder may be linked to heightened risk of further sexual or violent offending.
2) Describe a range of psychological approaches to the formulation of personality and its functional link to violent offending.
3) Explain the evidence base for psychological therapies for personality disorder.
4) Be confident in their psychologically informed case management skills in working with men with sexual and violent offenses and personality disorder.
5) Describe four “Offender Personality Disorder Pathway” outcomes.
6) Classify two overarching mentalizing modes that can be useful in treatment and case management.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain the ways in which personality disorder may be linked to heightened risk of further sexual or violent offending.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe a range of psychological approaches to the formulation of personality and its functional link to violent offending.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the evidence base for psychological therapies for personality disorder.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Be confident in their psychologically informed case management skills in working with men with sexual and violent offenses and personality disorder.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Describe four “Offender Personality Disorder Pathway” outcomes.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Classify two overarching mentalizing modes that can be useful in treatment and case management.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the presenter(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the instructor’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all