Evaluation – Strengths-Based Intervention Planning for Desistance from Sexual Offending (OT224)

Email

Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate)

First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate)

License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes)

Issuing state/province, if applicable

Which of the following best describes you?

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.

I agree

1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little

2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all

5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Gwenda Willis) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Sharon Kelley) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

5.3. Rate the third instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David Thornton) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (Gwenda Willis) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Sharon Kelley) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

6.3. Rate the third instructor’s teaching ability (David Thornton) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain key elements of desistance theory” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Critique definitions of protective factors” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe a structured measure of protective factors (SAPROF-SO)” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain how the SAPROF-SO can inform treatment and release planning decisions” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Explain the Good Lives Model” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all

9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult

13.1. Rate the instructor (Gwenda Willis) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

13.2. Rate the instructor (Sharon Kelley) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

13.3. Rate the instructor (David Thornton) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future?

16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material?

17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better?

18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)?

19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training?

20. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? For example, did you enjoy the breakout room aspect of this training?