Evaluation – Shaping the Future: The Good Lives Model in Theory and Practice (OT108-A)

Email

Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate)

First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate)

License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes)

Issuing state/province, if applicable

Which of the following best describes you?

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.

I agree

1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little

2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all

5.1. Rate the first instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (David S. Prescott) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

5.2. Rate the second instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject (Gwenda M. Willis) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

6.1. Rate the first instructor’s teaching ability (David S. Prescott) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

6.2. Rate the second instructor’s teaching ability (Gwenda M. Willis) 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Explain the fundamental elements of what the GLM is and isn’t,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain GLM-based assessment and intervention planning,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Distinguish between integration and implementation of GLM,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all

9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult

13.1. Rate the first instructors (David S. Prescott) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

13.2. Rate the second instructors (Gwenda M. Willis) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future?

16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material?

17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better?

18. How long did it take you (HH:MM) to complete this course, including completing this form?