Evaluation Form: Case Conceptualization at the Front Lines: Moving Treatment or Supervision Forward

Thank you for attending the online training, Conceptualization at the Front Lines: Moving Treatment or Supervision Forward. We hope you enjoyed the presentation. In order to receive a Certificate of Attendance, you must complete and submit the evaluation form below.

Once we’ve verified you attended and reviewed your completed evaluation form, a certificate of completion will be processed. You will receive your certificate by email. This process usually takes no more than 2-3 weeks.

Please be aware that the certificates are emailed by Continuing Excellence, LLC. To ensure the email with your certificate does not end up in your spam folder, please add Info@ContinuingExcellence.com to your Safe Senders list.

Evaluation – Case Conceptualization at the Front Lines: Moving Treatment or Supervision Forward (OT218)

Training Name: Case Conceptualization at the Front Lines: Moving Treatment or Supervision Forward

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be able to:
1) Describe four components of the working alliance.
2) Explain how “approach goals” differ from “avoidance goals.”
3) Describe how using Motivational Interviewing to explore client ambivalence can build motivation to make difficult changes.
4) List at least seven “good life goals” that can be used in treatment and that are often implicated in behaviors that harm others.

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe four components of the working alliance.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Explain how “approach goals” differ from “avoidance goals.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Describe how using Motivational Interviewing to explore client ambivalence can build motivation to make difficult changes.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “List at least seven “good life goals” that can be used in treatment and that are often implicated in behaviors that harm others.” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low