Evaluation – Effective Use of Motivational Interviewing to Engage and Help People with Intimate Partner Violence (OT143-A)

Evaluation – Effective Use of Motivational Interviewing to Engage and Help People with Intimate Partner Violence (OT143-A)

Course Name: Effective Use of Motivational Interviewing to Engage and Help People with Intimate Partner Violence

Learning Objectives

As a result of this training, participants will be better able to:
1) Demonstrate skills for deeply listening to and understanding clients
2) Describe four components of the “spirit” of motivational interviewing
3) Explain the difference between motivational interviewing and person-centered and other models of care
4) Enact skills for responding to others with complex, empathic reflective statements using open questions to “move” the conversation.
5) Identify “change talk” within a person’s statements
6) Provide a crisp empathic summary statement collecting change talk with a closing inquiry/ open question

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.
1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little
2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all
4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all
5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Demonstrate skills for deeply listening to and understanding clients,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Describe four components of the “spirit” of motivational interviewing,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the difference between motivational interviewing and person-centered and other models of care,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree 5
7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Enact skills for responding to others with complex, empathic reflective statements using open questions to “move” the conversation,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Identify ‘change talk’ within a person’s statements,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree
7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met?
Learning Objective #6: “Provide a crisp empathic summary statement collecting change talk with a closing inquiry/ open question,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree 5
8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low
11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all
12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult
13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all
14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all