Evaluation – Awakening the Healing Soul: Indigenous Wisdom for Today’s Healers (OT151-A) Evaluation – Awakening the Healing Soul: Indigenous Wisdom for Today’s Healers (OT151-A) Course Name: Awakening the Healing Soul: Indigenous Wisdom for Today’s Healers Learning Objectives As a result of this training, attendees will be better able to: 1) Distinguish at least six fundamental differences between traditional and conventional Western healing methods. 2) Describe a framework of ethical guidelines to assure professionalism while employing traditional, indigenous-inspired healing methods. 3) Identify the altered states that occur in various religious and healing practices. 4) Identify at least four factors that have produced helpful placebo effects. 5) Identify elements of treatment that have a nocebo effect and skills needed to prevent them 6) Describe how quaternary prevention can focus on the prevention of harm through well-intended interventions 7) Provide plain-speaking and viable definitions of soul, medicine, and spirit. You have the option to remain anonymous. Please select your preference below: * Include your name and emailRemain anonymous Email * Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate) * License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes) Issuing state/province, if applicable Which of the following best describes you? * Select One PsychologistSocial WorkerCounselorStudentNone of the above I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate. * I agree 1. How much did you learn as a result of this CE program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little * 5 4 3 2 1 2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very current/relevant, 1 = Not current/not relevant at all * 5 4 3 2 1 4. How useful was the content of this CE program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all * 5 4 3 2 1 5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met? Learning Objective #1: “Distinguish at least six fundamental differences between traditional and conventional Western healing methods,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met? Learning Objective #2: “Describe a framework of ethical guidelines to assure professionalism while employing traditional, indigenous-inspired healing methods,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met? Learning Objective #3: “Identify the altered states that occur in various religious and healing practices,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met? Learning Objective #4: “Identify at least four factors that have produced helpful placebo effects,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met? Learning Objective #5: “Identify elements of treatment that have a nocebo effect and skills needed to prevent them,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.6. Would you agree that learning objective #6 was met? Learning Objective #6: “Describe how quaternary prevention can focus on the prevention of harm through well-intended interventions,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 7.7. Would you agree that learning objective #7 was met? Learning Objective #7: “Provide plain-speaking and viable definitions of soul, medicine, and spirit,” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree * 5 4 3 2 1 8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low * 5 4 3 2 1 11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all * 5 4 3 2 1 N/A 12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult * 5 4 3 2 1 13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very responsive, 1 = Not responsive at all * 5 4 3 2 1 15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future? * 16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material? * 17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better? * 18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)? * 19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training? 20. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? If you are human, leave this field blank. Submit Δ