Evaluation – A new approach to EMDR and the Treatment of Problematic Sexual Behavior (OT225)

Email

Last Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate)

First Name (as you’d like printed on your certificate)

License Number, if applicable (for identity verification purposes)

Issuing state/province, if applicable

Which of the following best describes you?

I certify that I am the above-named person completing this form and that the information I submit here is accurate.

I agree

1. How much did you learn as a result of this program? 5 = Very much, 1 = Very little

2. Rate the quality of the program content 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

3. Rate how current/relevant the program content is 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

4. How useful was the content of this program for your practice or other professional development? 5 = Extremely Useful, 1 = Not Useful at all

5. Rate the instructor’s knowledge and expertise of the subject 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

6. Rate the instructor’s teaching ability 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

7.1. Would you agree that learning objective #1 was met?
Learning Objective #1: “Describe why assessing a client’s attachment style is foundational to effective case conceptualization for those who have caused sexual harm” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.2. Would you agree that learning objective #2 was met?
Learning Objective #2: “Define the Offense Driver Model” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.3. Would you agree that learning objective #3 was met?
Learning Objective #3: “Explain the function of Adaptive Information Processing in the EMDR therapy process” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.4. Would you agree that learning objective #4 was met?
Learning Objective #4: “Explain the offense driver parallel process when applying therapeutic interventions” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

7.5. Would you agree that learning objective #5 was met?
Learning Objective #5: “Utilize case conceptualization and treatment planning to address etiological, root causes” 5 = Strongly agree, 1 = Strongly disagree

8. Rate how well the program met your expectations (according to the promotional materials) 5 = Very well, 1 = Not well at all

9. Rate the quality of the provided course materials 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

10. Rate the quality of the facilities (in-person) or technology (online). 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

11. Rate how well disability accommodations were met, if requested. 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

12. Rate the ease of the registration process 5 = Very Easy, 1 = Very Difficult

13. Rate the instructor(s) responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

14. Rate the program staff’s responsiveness to questions 5 = Very High, 1 = Very Low

15. How will the information from this program be useful to you in the future?

16. What did the program (or presenter/s) do particularly well that helped you understand the material?

17. What, if anything, could the program (or presenter/s) have done differently to help you understand the material better?

18. About how long did it take you to complete this course (including completing this form)?

19. OPTIONAL: How did you learn about this training?

20. OPTIONAL: Do you have any additional thoughts or comments you’d like to share with us? For example, did you enjoy the breakout room aspect of this training?